Results 1 to 9 of 9
-
12th May 2017 #1
'Heart Attack Risk' For Common Painkillers?
www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-39858179 ...
... next thing, they'll be saying it's a risk to even breathe!
-
13th May 2017 #2
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- Pangasinan
- Posts
- 25,597
- Rep Power
- 150
Exactly Arthur. Unfortunately 'Wolf' is cried too many times.
I do my best to live a healthy lifestyle. All things in moderation. Can't do much more.
The stress of worrying about all this stuff is probably more likely to do you in.
-
13th May 2017 #3
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Posts
- 4,623
- Rep Power
- 150
It’s already been accepted that these types of painkillers may increase the risk of heart attacks.
This new study is reported as claiming they may increase the risk by up to 100%.
It uses statistical terms which may well be misunderstood by health reporters, patients, and even doctors .
" Meta-analysis " combines results from a number of studies. " Bayesian " takes into account previous information. " Odds ratio " and " relative risk " of greater than 1 means increased risk from whatever factor is being studied.
This was an " observational study " - they couldn’t prove cause and effect. It was also on patients who had prescribed, not " over-the-counter ", painkillers.
It's vital to know the " absolute risk " - the probability that an event ( heart attack ) will happen. This new study didn’t make clear this baseline risk of people having heart attacks.
The absolute risk of any one of us having a heart attack varies - from around nil in a young female to perhaps 5% in an older man. It depends on well known risk factors, some of which can’t be changed ( age, gender, race, family history ) ; whereas others can possibly be modified ( such as cholesterol level, smoking, diabetes, obesity, high blood pressure ). When asked, the authors of this paper said " … it seems reasonable to conclude that the absolute risk due to NSAIDS is on average increased by about 0.5-1% per year ".
These drugs can be effective, although they should be used in moderation ( in some cases not at all ); other drugs may be available; and continuous pain / inflammation needs treatment if it is not itself to cause more illness.
The reporting of this topic in the media - as with other health topics - could have been better. As always, moderation in all things and taking advice if needed from a doctor you can trust seems the sensible way forward .
-
14th May 2017 #4
-
15th May 2017 #5
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Posts
- 4,623
- Rep Power
- 150
Thank you for reading and responding to my post, Michael - interesting to know that you have not used pain killers for so many years .
-
16th May 2017 #6
-
17th May 2017 #7
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Posts
- 4,623
- Rep Power
- 150
All of us do suffer pain at some time or other. Acute pain, which is sudden in onset, and typically short-lived, may have a " biological " or protective function ( such as withdrawal from a hot surface ). Chronic pain may be very long-lasting, as in arthritis or a reaction to cancer.
Medication for pain depends on its type and severity ( see link ). ALL painkillers have potential side effects, so it’s a balance between advantages and disadvantages of taking them. They may be available " over-the-counter " or require prescription. Of course some may be obtained illegally, not necessarily taken in safe amounts or to relieve pain, perhaps with serious consequences ( opioid / morphine-like drug overdoses, car crashes, and killing by guns may EACH account for about a third of 100,000 deaths a year in USA ).
People’s attitudes to risks naturally vary. We know the main cardiovascular risk factors, not all of which can be changed. But any calculation of risk is only as good as the evidence it’s based on. The idea with meta-analysis is that by making studies larger by combining data, this reduces chance in the results. There are several " risk calculators " for heart disease - with NO consensus as to which is best.
The difference between relative and absolute risk may apply not only to risk of a heart attack, but also other conditions and treatments :-
What is misleading in the media reporting ( or even original writing ) of the " NSAIDs and heart attacks " study is that an increase in RELATIVE risk appears more alarming than ABSOLUTE risk. Similarly " treatment breakthroughs " or " increase in cancers " may appear more dramatic when reported as RELATIVE changes.
Doctors must keep up to date and clearly inform their patients - hopefully in retirement I’ve explained this topic to interested members !
-
17th May 2017 #8
Very interesting read Alan.
-
17th May 2017 #9
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
*Star Architect Suffers Fatal Heart Attack
By Arthur Little in forum Living in the UKReplies: 0Last Post: 31st March 2016, 23:27 -
Heart attack on a plate £1.50 @ Dundee Ninewells Hospital
By Dedworth in forum Loose Talk, Chat and Off TopicReplies: 2Last Post: 27th August 2014, 21:35 -
Expect to hear about this waste of space lard having a heart attack v soon!
By Dedworth in forum News UKReplies: 4Last Post: 12th May 2014, 04:01 -
Innocent man released after 23 years in jail suffers heart attack on second day of freedom
By joebloggs in forum News - WorldReplies: 4Last Post: 29th March 2013, 23:48 -
The Monkees - Davy Jones dies of a Heart Attack
By Rosie1958 in forum News UKReplies: 20Last Post: 1st March 2012, 21:55