Disclaimer: By posting on this web site it is accepted that you have agreed to our Terms. Please DO NOT publish copyrighted material/pictures without the owner’s permission, you are liable for any costs incurred.


Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Berkshire
    Posts
    18,267
    Rep Power
    0

    Charlie Hebdo killers should NOT be called 'terrorists', claims BBC executive

    The Islamists who committed the Charlie Hebdo massacre in Paris should be not be described as “terrorists” by the BBC, a senior executive at the corporation has said.


    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/me...-10001739.html

    The BBC shows it's left wing, treasonous credentials once again. A complete disgrace




  2. #2
    Moderator Arthur Little's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    City of Perth, Scotland
    Posts
    24,230
    Rep Power
    150
    ... should be PPC=Preposterous Political Correctness!


  3. #3
    Respected Member Ako Si Jamie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Birmingham
    Posts
    7,191
    Rep Power
    150
    The head of BBC Arabic is an idiot. Actually I'll take that back in case I offend an idiot.


  4. #4
    Respected Member les_taxi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Happiest place to live in UK
    Posts
    8,896
    Rep Power
    150
    What a set of ....wits!

    Good job I don't post my true feelings on here, Keith would have to ban me as I'd go for it!


  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Berkshire
    Posts
    18,267
    Rep Power
    0
    PETER MCKAY: Why is the BBC being so polite to terrorists?

    According to the BBC, Japanese hostage Kenji Goto was beheaded by Islamic State ‘militants’. This has the effect of suggesting Islamic State has ‘moderates’ opposed to the terrorist organisation’s spectacularly violent acts.

    ‘Militant’ is a word we use to describe union leaders, feminists, or anyone arguing fiercely for their cause. Those who murder to spread fear, in the hope of destabilising governments, are terrorists.

    Is that too simple for the BBC?

    ‘Today’s terrorist is tomorrow’s freedom-fighter,’ say rationalists, citing Sinn Fein’s Gerry Adams and Martin McGuinness. But Adams and McGuinness deny shooting and bombing on behalf of the Provisional IRA.

    We might not believe their denials. Neither might the politicians who negotiated with them. But Adams and McGuinness know they wouldn’t be important politicos now if they’d said they had killed people for their cause.

    They are where they are because we lost our appetite for fighting IRA terrorism. We preferred a ‘peace process’ — releasing jailed IRA ‘active service volunteers’, empowering their political leaders — to fighting terrorism.

    But the head of BBC Arabic, Tarik Kafala, says terrorist is ‘too loaded’ a word. Too loaded for whom? Islamic State, Boko Haram (another Islamist group) or IRA supporters? Should the BBC care what they think? And would any terrorist prefer to be called a ‘militant’?

    The Charlie Hebdo killers in Paris should not be described as terrorists, said the BBC boss. ‘We try to avoid describing anyone as a terrorist, or an act as being terrorist. What we try to do is to say that “two men killed 12 people in an attack on the office of a satirical magazine”.

    "That’s enough. We know what political violence is, we know what murder, bombings and shootings are and we describe them. That’s much more revealing, we believe, than using a word like “terrorist”, which people will see as value-laden.’

    Do you meet many people who fret about words being ‘value-laden’? I don’t personally. And why should the head of BBC Arabic have the last word on how we describe Islamic State or Al Qaeda? No reason I can think of; but he’s in tune with official BBC thinking. According to the BBC’s guidelines, it does not ban ‘terrorist’ as such.

    ‘However, we do ask that careful thought is given to its use by a BBC voice. There are ways of conveying the full horror and human consequences of acts of terror without using the word “terrorist” to describe the perpetrators.

    "The value judgments frequently implicit in the use of the words “terrorist” or “terrorist group” can create inconsistency in their use or, to audiences, raise doubts about our impartiality.’

    Inconsistency? Doubts about the BBC’s impartiality?

    It’s never occurred to me the BBC was consistent about reporting terrorism, or that it is impartial. Especially not the latter.

    The BBC is what it is: a sprawling, so-called public service, costing more than £3 billion a year, in which the brilliance of a small number of broadcasters is used to justify an inverted pyramid of lavishly paid bureaucrats.

    Agonising about how best to describe terrorists, pondering on what ‘the BBC voice’ can and cannot say, is absurd. Is it their attention-seeking way of justifying their existence?

    We want to see and hear what is happening in the news, with as much detail as possible. We don’t need to know why the BBC thinks some words acceptable and others not.

    They should get over themselves.

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/ar...#ixzz3QaItmfcM
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook


  6. #6
    Respected Member andy222's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    West Midlands and Butuan
    Posts
    6,440
    Rep Power
    150
    I can't see the problem, they are all killers at the end of the day.


  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Berkshire
    Posts
    18,267
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by andy222 View Post
    I can't see the problem, they are all killers at the end of the day.
    There is a problem - it's not just some leftie unwashed student talking about these vermin it is our State-owned broadcaster who can influence the thoughts of the young, stupid or naive. It's very well summed up early in the article :-

    Militant’ is a word we use to describe union leaders, feminists, or anyone arguing fiercely for their cause. Those who murder to spread fear, in the hope of destabilising governments, are terrorists.


  8. #8
    Respected Member andy222's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    West Midlands and Butuan
    Posts
    6,440
    Rep Power
    150
    Just keep paying your TV Licence Ded and contributing to it.


  9. #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Berkshire
    Posts
    18,267
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by andy222 View Post
    Just keep paying your TV Licence Ded and contributing to it.
    I watch very little BBC nowadays Andy as I'd prefer my expensive TV to stay unbroken


  10. #10
    Respected Member andy222's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    West Midlands and Butuan
    Posts
    6,440
    Rep Power
    150


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Investing in Executive flats??
    By milesaway1113 in forum Living in the Philippines
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 7th April 2014, 11:59
  2. Bolivia boy's 'killers' found dead in Brazil prison
    By joebloggs in forum News - World
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 1st September 2013, 22:39
  3. Three killers strung up by the Japs
    By Dedworth in forum News - World
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 22nd February 2013, 23:14

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Filipino Forum : Philippine Forum