Disclaimer: By posting on this web site it is accepted that you have agreed to our Terms. Please DO NOT publish copyrighted material/pictures without the owner’s permission, you are liable for any costs incurred.


Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 91 to 101 of 101
  1. #91
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Southern England
    Posts
    5,102
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Arthur Little View Post
    ... they're the very ones who need it MOST!!
    I agree, Arthur


  2. #92
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Southern England
    Posts
    5,102
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by DeltaRomeo View Post
    A very interesting thread.. personally I would go along with the no earning threshold but with some kind of signed contract that No public funding would be claimed. In reality of course this couldn't work.. none of us knows what is around the corner and how circumstances may change. But there again.. If an earning threshold is upheld.. who knows how secure that earning capability is?
    And would also agree with that.....nobody indeed knows whats around the corner...its a comforting thought there's always the generous welfare system to fall back on. Joke!


  3. #93
    Moderator joebloggs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Somewhere else
    Posts
    23,162
    Rep Power
    150
    you've a right to claim what ever benefits your entitled to, and where your wife is from shouldn't matter at all (is that not discrimination ? )
    gWapito i'm against people abusing the system, infact i think if you've not paid in, you can't take out of the system.

    the gov if it does go ahead will open a big can of worms, it will face many court cases, and judicial reviews, it will either U turn or it will be forced into changing the figure to a lower figure. The gov has a record at winning immigration cases, it was forced into lower the age back to 18 from 21, it was forced into cancelling the COA (cert of approval) if you wanted to get married, but this is a bigger ball game than them and bigger than the pasty tax
    http://www.filipinouk.com/forum/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=870&dateline=1270312908


  4. #94
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    G.B. (IOM)
    Posts
    8,776
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by joebloggs View Post
    ...... and bigger than the pasty tax


    Big news in Cornwall.....


  5. #95
    Moderator joebloggs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Somewhere else
    Posts
    23,162
    Rep Power
    150
    Quote Originally Posted by lastlid View Post


    Big news in Cornwall.....
    Mark Samworth, who heads Samworth Brothers which owns the Ginsters brand, gave £100,000 to the Tories, between the announcement of the VAT change in the budget and the government’s volte face on Monday.
    http://politicalscrapbook.net/2012/0...ory-donations/




    maybe everyone on here and other forums similar could have a whip round and make a donation the gov will change their mind to about the minimum income
    http://www.filipinouk.com/forum/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=870&dateline=1270312908


  6. #96
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    G.B. (IOM)
    Posts
    8,776
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by joebloggs View Post
    Mark Samworth, who heads Samworth Brothers which owns the Ginsters brand, gave £100,000 to the Tories, between the announcement of the VAT change in the budget and the government’s volte face on Monday.
    http://politicalscrapbook.net/2012/0...ory-donations/





    maybe everyone on here and other forums similar could have a whip round and make a donation the gov will change their mind to about the minimum income

    Yes. I saw Dedworth's posting on that. I just find the pasty thing quite funny.

    http://filipinaroses.com/showthread....Pasty+La+Vista


  7. #97
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Southern England
    Posts
    5,102
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by joebloggs View Post
    you've a right to claim what ever benefits your entitled to, and where your wife is from shouldn't matter at all (is that not discrimination ? )
    gWapito i'm against people abusing the system, infact i think if you've not paid in, you can't take out of the system.

    the gov if it does go ahead will open a big can of worms, it will face many court cases, and judicial reviews, it will either U turn or it will be forced into changing the figure to a lower figure. The gov has a record at winning immigration cases, it was forced into lower the age back to 18 from 21, it was forced into cancelling the COA (cert of approval) if you wanted to get married, but this is a bigger ball game than them and bigger than the pasty tax
    You are right, of course although it pains me to say it.

    I think lastlid copied and pasted something earlier yesterday and it makes sense....well, it does to me.....the consensus being, implementing this proposal, wont work.

    Again there are far too many other injustices going on for it to work...like you said 'discrimination' .

    Others on here have said it would/ could be a vote winner..quite possibly....like its been said before...the genuine law abiding immigrant getting tarred with all those EuroTrash.

    The stories in the papers dont help there cause.


  8. #98
    Moderator joebloggs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Somewhere else
    Posts
    23,162
    Rep Power
    150
    Quote Originally Posted by lastlid View Post
    Yes. I saw Dedworth's posting on that. I just find the pasty thing quite funny.
    at least you knew where you was with this guy
    http://www.filipinouk.com/forum/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=870&dateline=1270312908


  9. #99
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    G.B. (IOM)
    Posts
    8,776
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by joebloggs View Post
    at least you knew where you was with this guy
    Alan B,Stard. A blast from the past. I used to like this guys comedy. Dont see so much of him these days. Him and Aid Edmondson.


  10. #100
    Moderator joebloggs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Somewhere else
    Posts
    23,162
    Rep Power
    150
    at least he had a backbone unlike most PM's and MP's these days

    ade still about (going around England's countryside) , not seen much of Rik thou , they met at University of Manchester
    http://www.filipinouk.com/forum/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=870&dateline=1270312908


  11. #101
    Moderator joebloggs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Somewhere else
    Posts
    23,162
    Rep Power
    150


    it looked like someone else said YES,YES, YES
    http://www.filipinouk.com/forum/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=870&dateline=1270312908


Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. News - Visa Minimum Income Case
    By sheldon1 in forum UK VISA/British Citizenship
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 3rd October 2014, 10:14
  2. Minimum income threshold for family migrants
    By Terpe in forum UK VISA/British Citizenship
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11th July 2013, 09:26
  3. New minimum income requirements for UK spouse visa
    By Robert86 in forum UK VISA/British Citizenship
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 18th June 2012, 22:32
  4. Minimum income requirement for spouse visa
    By Robert86 in forum Introduce Yourself
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 14th January 2012, 11:51
  5. Replies: 12
    Last Post: 26th September 2011, 15:30

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Filipino Forum : Philippine Forum